1. Plan your coursework before you begin writing.
2. Review
previous student’s coursework and use their structure as a template to inform your
writing.
3. Review
the guidelines on the exam website for your coursework and familiarize yourself
with the criteria your teacher’s will be using to mark your personal
investigation.
4. Remember
you should be the expert in your field of study, so constantly review your
argument.
5. Embed your discussion and
argument with the language of source analysis (effectively, correctly and
appropriately) so use expression you may have been encouraged to use by your
teacher such as validly asserts, credibly, reliability, compelling, justifiably
etc..
6. Don’t just agree with the
question, but produce a balanced argument, using a range of sources and
historians for both sides.
7. Whether
you decide to support the question or disagree with the question or offer a
synthesis approach as provided by Kershaw, ensure you sustain your focus,
support with historical evidence, historians analysis and assess and examine
the reliability and credibility of your argument.
8. You
cannot say something is credibly and then deny its credibility in the next
sentence.
9. You must
build up a sustained argument to support or refute the historian’s credibility
throughout.
10. Support
every point with as many historians as you can.
11. Link each
paragraph back to the question.
12. Come to a conclusion which answers the question
definitely.
No comments:
Post a Comment